Students eligible for free or discounted lunch at West Side Elementary School
Compare
| Year |
# Students |
Full-time Teachers |
Student/Teacher ratio |
% Free/Discounted Lunch |
| 1988 |
181 |
8.8 |
20.5 |
8.8 |
| 1989 |
183 |
7.9 |
23.1 |
10.4 |
| 1990 |
173 |
7.0 |
24.7 |
12.1 |
| 1991 |
192 |
8.1 |
23.7 |
12.5 |
| 1992 |
187 |
9.0 |
20.7 |
14.4 |
| 1993 |
183 |
8.4 |
21.8 |
13.1 |
| 1994 |
185 |
8.4 |
22.0 |
10.8 |
| 1995 |
125 |
8.0 |
15.6 |
8 |
| 1996 |
125 |
8.0 |
15.6 |
8 |
| 1997 |
115 |
9.0 |
12.8 |
16.5 |
| 1998 |
111 |
8.0 |
13.9 |
14.4 |
| 1999 |
105 |
6.9 |
15.2 |
18.1 |
| 2000 |
203 |
12.7 |
16.0 |
14.1 |
| 2001 |
239 |
12.0 |
19.9 |
13 |
| 2002 |
220 |
15.9 |
13.8 |
13.6 |
| 2003 |
220 |
15.9 |
13.8 |
13.6 |
| 2004 |
198 |
16.8 |
11.8 |
20.2 |
| 2005 |
208 |
15.0 |
13.9 |
18.3 |
| 2006 |
212 |
15.5 |
13.7 |
18.4 |
| 2007 |
217 |
13.6 |
16.0 |
23 |
| 2008 |
25 |
4.2 |
6.0 |
36 |
| 2009 |
23 |
3.7 |
6.2 |
60.9 |
| 2010 |
22 |
4.2 |
5.1 |
59.1 |
| 2011 |
46 |
5.1 |
9.0 |
41.3 |
| 2012 |
71 |
5.2 |
13.5 |
26.8 |
| 2013 |
70 |
5.2 |
13.4 |
28.6 |
| 2014 |
56 |
4.7 |
11.9 |
28.6 |
| 2015 |
79 |
5.0 |
15.8 |
21.5 |
| 2016 |
58 |
6.0 |
9.6 |
22.4 |
| 2017 |
56 |
5.8 |
9.5 |
32.1 |
| 2018 |
60 |
4.9 |
12.0 |
26.7 |
| 2019 |
60 |
3.4 |
17.4 |
18.3 |
| 2020 |
58 |
3.8 |
15.0 |
25.9 |
| 2021 |
41 |
3.8 |
10.6 |
14.6 |
| 2022 |
26 |
0.0 |
n/a |
23.1 |
| 2024 |
25 |
n/a |
n/a |
40 |
Data source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education.
About Students eligible for discounted/free lunch:
The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) provides low-cost or free meals to students in U.S. public and nonprofit private schools based on household income. Those with incomes below 130% of the poverty line receive free lunch, while those between 130% and 185% qualify for reduced-price lunch. The percentage of students receiving free or reduced-price lunch serves as a marker for poverty, as it reflects the socioeconomic status of families in a given school or district. A higher FRPL rate typically indicates a higher concentration of low-income families, suggesting that the school or district may face additional challenges in providing adequate resources and support for student success.